The Harm of Coming into Existence

Better Never To Have Been: The Harm Of Coming Into Existence PDF

David Benatar . Better Never To Have Been : The Harm of Coming into Existence ( Oxford : Oxford University

In this book, David Benatar argues that every person is severely harmed by being brought into existence, and that in bringing any person into existence one impermissibly harms that person. His conclusion is not merely that by bringing a person into existence, one harms him. That claim is compatible with the claim that by bringing a person into existence, one also greatly benefits him, and even ...

Krister Bykvist the Benefits of Coming into Existence

This paper argues that we can benefit or harm people by creating them, but only in the sense that we can create things that are good or bad for them. What we cannot do is to confer comparative benefits and harms to people by creating them or failing to create them. You are not better off (or worse off) created than you would have been had you not been created, for nothing has value for you if y...

Mulla Sadra on the world of pre- existence and Covenant

  Mulla Sadra is of the view that the discursive people are unable to grasp the reality of the departure of descendants in atomic form from Adamchr('39')s loin, this is for this reason that man possesses various levels of resurrection and mustering. But according to Mulla Sadrachr('39')s ontology man before coming into this world possessed intellectual ipseities which is originated from the lo...

Is it wrong to impose the harms of human life? A reply to Benatar.

Might it be morally wrong to procreate? David Benatar answers affirmatively in Better Never to Have Been, arguing that coming into existence is always a great harm. I counter this view in several ways. First, I argue against Benatar's asserted asymmetry between harm and benefit--which would support the claim that any amount of harm in a human life would make it not worth starting--while questio...